How to perform a successful drug-coated balloon angioplasty? Tips and tricks.

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) offer an excellent alternative to stents as the antiproliferative drugs are delivered via balloons and hence there is no permanent implant of metal or polymer. This rationale applies perfectly in in-stent restenosis (ISR) as we want to avoid another layer of metal in a previously failed stent. However, their use has also been extended to de novo lesions especially in patients and lesion subsets where stents are not ideal. There is an increased desire toward expanding this further and studies are now being done which are testing DCB in large-caliber vessels. As the use of DCB is escalating, we felt the importance of writing this article whereby we aim to provide important tips and tricks when using DCB especially for the operators who are in the early phase or have the desire of embarking this technology. From our experience, the DCB-angioplasty substantially differs on several aspects from DES-angioplasty. We have provided several case bases examples including algorithm when using DCB in ISR and de novo lesions.

Which predilatation balloons provide the best lesion preparation prior to use of drug coated balloons in de-novo lesions? Results from the PREPARE study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on the clinical outcomes following the use of different strategies for lesion preparation prior to the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB). In this study, we have explored the clinical outcomes between different types of predilatation balloons: semi-compliant (SB), non-compliant (NB) and scoring balloons (ScB) used when preparing de-novo lesions prior to the use of DCB. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent treatment with DCB for de-novo lesions between 2011-2019 at 4 high-volume European centres. The measured study endpoints were cardiac-death, TV-MI, TLR and MACE. RESULTS: During the study period, 553 patients were treated with DCB for de-novo lesions, 327 with SB only, 172 with NB and 54 with ScB. There were some differences in the procedural characteristics between the 3 groups. Predilatation balloons were significantly larger in the ScB, and NB groups as compared to the SB (2.7 mm and 2.6 mm vs. 2.3 mm; P<0.001). The reference vessel diameter was significantly larger in the NB group as compared to the ScB and SB (2.6 mm vs. 2.2 mm and 2.3 mm; P<0.001). During the median follow-up duration of 547-days, there were no differences in the hard-clinical endpoints, however, TLR was significantly higher in the ScB as compared to SB and NB group (11% vs. 3.4% and 4.7%; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The PREPARE study results do not suggest routine use of ScB prior to DCB in de-novo lesions.

Long-term outcomes following intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for calcified coronary lesions: A Real-World Multicenter European Study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the long-term clinical outcomes following intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in calcified coronary lesions from a real-world population. BACKGROUND: IVL is a relatively new but promising modality for treating coronary calcified lesions, but there is a dearth of long-term outcome data from real-world patients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational study in which we enrolled all patients treated with IVL from November 2018 to February 2021 from eight centers in Europe and the United Kingdom. Procedural success, complications, and clinical outcomes (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction [TVMI], target lesion revascularization [TLR], and MACE [major adverse cardiac events, the composite of cardiac death, TVMI, and TLR]) were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 273 patients with a mean age of 72 ± 9.1 years were treated with IVL. Major comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (n = 110, 40%) and chronic kidney disease (n = 45, 16%). Acute coronary syndrome accounted for 48% (n = 132) of patients, while 52% (n = 141) had stable angina. De novo lesions and in-stent restenosis accounted for 79% and 21% of cases, respectively. Intravascular imaging was used in 33% (n = 90) of patients. An upfront IVL strategy was adopted in 34% (n = 92), while the rest were bailout procedures. Adjuvant rotational atherectomy ("RotaTripsy") was required in 11% (n = 31) of cases. The procedural success was 99%. During a median follow-up of 687 days (interquartile range: 549-787), cardiac death occurred in 5% (n = 14), TVMI in 3% (n = 8), TLR in 6% (n = 16), and MACE rate was 11% (n = 30). CONCLUSION: This is the largest multicenter registry with a long-term follow-up showing the remarkably high procedural success of IVL use in calcified coronary lesions with low rates of hard endpoints and MACE.

"RotaTripsy" for Severe Calcified Coronary Artery Lesions: Insights From a Real-World Multicenter Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the "RotaTripsy" approach in severe calcified coronary artery lesions. BACKGROUND: Coronary lesions with a high calcium content represent a challenging scenario in interventional cardiology, requiring a proper lesion preparation. In this light, very little is known about the possibility to combine the benefits of rotational atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 34 patients from a real-word, multicenter, cohort of patients affected by severe calcified coronary artery lesions, which required the "RotaTripsy" to obtain a proper lesion preparation. In all the cases, rotational atherectomy and then intravascular lithotripsy were performed as a bail-out strategy following sub-optimal non-compliant balloon expansion. In 53% of the cases, the procedure was guided by intracoronary imaging findings. RESULTS: Procedural success was reported in all the cases, without any in-hospital major complication. Few major adverse clinical events were reported at mid-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: "RotaTripsy" can represent a valid therapeutic option for undilatable heavily calcified coronary artery lesions. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of this approach.

Long-term Outcome following Percutaneous Intervention of Intra-stent Coronary Occlusion and Evaluating the Different Treatment Modalities.

BACKGROUND: Angioplasty for ISR remains a challenge with relatively high rates of recurrence. Although there is a plethora of data on ISR, there is relatively less data on intra-stent-CTO. In this study, we explore the long-term clinical outcomes following angioplasty to intra-stent CTO and study the differences in clinical outcomes between three treatment-arms: POBA vs. DES vs. DCB. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated all patients who underwent PCI to intra-stent CTO between 2011 and 2017. The endpoints used were: cardiac-death, TVMI, TLR, TVR, and MACE.During the study period, 403-patients with a mean age of 69.2 years had successful PCI to intra-stent CTO. 50% were diabetic, 38% had CKD and 32% had left ventricular dysfunction. 93% of cases were stable angina. 22% (n = 88) received only POBA, 28% (n = 113) received DCB and 50% (n = 202) received DES. During the median follow-up of 48-months, cardiac-death occurred in 5.8% (n = 23), TVMI in 4% (n = 16), TLR in 45.6% (n = 182), TVR in 48.7% (n = 194) and MACE of 46%. There were no differences in the hard endpoints between the 3treatment arms. However, the TLR and overall MACE were better in DCB and DES-groups as compared to POBA (TLR: 33%vs.42%vs.49%; p = 0.06); MACE (34% vs. 45% vs. 52%; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the first study that has focussed on the outcomes following angioplasty to intra-stent CTOs with a very long-term follow-up. The hard endpoints were low, although the TLR rates were high. In regards to treatment strategy, the DCB and DES provide relatively better outcomes than POBA.

Intravascular lithotripsy in calcified-coronary lesions: A real-world observational, European multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The recently introduced intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) appears promising and relatively safer than conventional approaches when dealing with calcified lesions. Although there are published reports on this novel technology, data from the real world are limited. In this study, we aim to report on the experience of IVL from a real-world population derived from six European centers that undertake high-volume complex coronary interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled all patients treated with IVL between November 2018 and February 2020 at six centers. Procedural success and complications were assessed along with clinical outcomes, which included: cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), target lesion revascularisation (TLR), and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (composite of cardiac death, TVMI, and TLR). Hundred and ninety patients (200 lesions) with a mean age of 72 years were treated using IVL. Diabetes and chronic kidney disease were present in 50% (n = 95) and 16% (n = 30) of cases, respectively. Acute-coronary syndromes accounted for 91 (48%) of the cases. Most were de-novo lesions (77%; n = 154). Upfront use of IVL occurred in 26% of cases, while the rest were bail-out procedures due to inadequate predilatation with conventional balloons. Adjuvant rotational atherectomy was needed in 17% of cases. Procedural success was achieved in 99% of cases with a complication rate of 3%. During the median follow-up of 222 days, there was two cardiac deaths (1%), one case of TVMI (0.5%), 3 TLR (1.5%) taking the MACE rate to 2.6%. CONCLUSION: Use of IVL appears to be safe and effective in dealing with calcified-coronary lesions. A high success rate was observed with low procedural complications and event rates.

Mid-term clinical outcomes from use of Sirolimus coated balloon in coronary intervention; data from real world population.

BACKGROUND: Use of drug coated balloons (DCBs) in coronary intervention is escalating. There is a plethora of data on Paclitaxcel-DCB. However, when it comes of stents, Limus-drugs are preferred over Paclitaxel. There is very limited data on Sirolimus coated balloons (SCB). MagicTouch-SCB (Concept Medical, FL) elutes Sirolimus via nano-technology and have been used in our centers since March 2018. We report a mid-term follow-up with this relatively novel-technology. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients treated with MagicTouch-SCB between March-2018 and February-2019. Results are reported as cardiac-death, target-vessel myocardial-infarction (TVMI), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE). During the study period, 288-patients (373-lesions) with a mean age of 65.8 were treated with MagicTouch-SCB. 84% (n = 241) were male, 155 (54%) were in the setting of acute coronary syndrome, 38% (n = 110) had diabetes and 62% (n = 233) were in de-novo lesions. Most lesions treated were in the LAD/diagonal-system (n = 170; 46%). Pre-dilatation was performed in 92% (n = 345) of cases. Bailout stenting was required in 9% lesions (n = 35). The mean diameter and length of SCBs were 2.64 ± 0.56 mm and 24 ± 8.9 mm respectively. During a median follow-up of 363 days (IQR: 278-435), cardiac death and TVMI occurred in 5-patients (1.7%) and 10-patients (3.4%) respectively, TLR per-lesion was 12%. The MACE rate was 10%. There were no documented cases of acute vessel closure. CONCLUSIONS: The results from mid-term follow-up with this relatively new technology SCB is encouraging with a low rates of hard endpoints and acceptable MACE rates despite complex group of patients and lesion subsets.

Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the relationships among access site practice, clinical presentation, and procedural outcomes in a large patient population. BACKGROUND: Transradial access (TRA) has been associated with improved patient outcomes in selected populations in randomized trials. It is unclear whether these outcomes are achievable in clinical practice. METHODS: Using the BCIS (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society) database, we investigated outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention procedures undertaken between 2007 and 2012 according to access site practice. Patients were categorized as stable, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) and ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEACS). The impact of access site on 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiac events, bleeding, and arterial access site complications was studied. RESULTS: Data from 210,260 TRA and 229,687 transfemoral access procedures were analyzed. Following multivariate analysis, TRA was independently associated with a reduction in bleeding in all presenting syndromes (stable odds ratio [OR]: 0.24, p < 0.001; NSTEACS OR: 0.35, p < 0.001; STEACS OR: 0.47, p < 0.001) as well as access site complications (stable OR: 0.21, p < 0.001; NSTEACS OR: 0.19; STEACS OR: 0.16, p < 0.001). TRA was associated with reduced major adverse cardiac events only in patients with unstable syndromes (stable OR: 1.08, p = 0.25; NSTEACS OR: 0.72, p < 0.001; STEACS OR: 0.70, p < 0.001). TRA was associated with improved outcomes compared with a transfemoral access (TFA) with a vascular closure device in a propensity matched cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this large study, TRA is associated with reduced percutaneous coronary intervention-related complications in all patient groups and may reduce major adverse cardiac events and mortality in ACS patients. TRA is superior to transfemoral access with closure devices. Use of TRA may lead to important patient benefits in routine practice. TRA should be considered the preferred access site for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Published data relating to arterial access site selection and radiation exposure during coronary procedures suggest radial access may lead to increased radiation exposure, but this is based on poorly controlled studies. We sought to measure radiation exposure to patients and operators during elective coronary angiography (CA) according to access site, with other procedure related variables controlled for. We also investigated the specific effect of operator expertise in relation to radiation exposure. METHODS: 100 consecutive patients undergoing first time elective CA were recruited prospectively. An expert transradial (TR) and an expert transfemoral (TF) operator performed 25 cases each via their default route. A trainee cardiologist with intermediate experience in both access sites performed 25 cases via each route. Angiographic projections were standardised and optimised radiation protection was utilised for all procedures. The primary endpoints were operator and patient exposure, quantified by effective dose (ED) and dose area product (DAP) respectively. Secondary endpoints included fluoroscopy time (FT) and time to patient ambulation. RESULTS: The trainee operator recorded higher values for radiation exposure in radial and femoral cases when compared to the expert operators. There were no significant differences in radiation exposure during CA to operator or patient according to access site when standardised by operator experience. For the trainee, ED for TR and TF procedures was 8.8 ± 4.3 µSv and 8.5 ± 6.5 µSv (P = .86) and DAP was 25.4 ± 4.8 Gycm(2) vs 25.2 ± 8.3 Gycm(2) (P = .9). For the expert TR and TF operators, ED was 6.4 ± 4.7 µSv vs 6.1 ± 5.6 µSv (P = .85) and DAP was 21.7 ± 6.5 Gycm(2) vs 22.4 ± 8.0 Gycm(2), (P = .74). There was no significant difference in FT in relation to access site. Time to ambulation was significantly longer with TF access. CONCLUSION: The use of TR access has no adverse effect on radiation exposure or FT for diagnostic CA, but does allow for quicker ambulation compared to TF access. The magnitude of radiation exposure is related to operator expertise for both access sites. The results of previous studies reflect the effect of uncontrolled patient and operator variables and not access site selection.

Plasma indices of angiogenesis in rheumatoid disease: relationship to cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac function.

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid Disease (RD) is associated with increased rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Angiogenesis is central to RD, and well-recognized in CVD. We hypothesised that plasma levels of two indices associated with angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiogenin, would be higher among RD patients compared to healthy controls (HC), would relate to CVD risk factors, calculated 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke risk scores. METHODS: 144 clinic patients with established RD and 63 HC were recruited in a cross-sectional study. RD patients were grouped according to the presence (RD-CVD, n=73 or absence (non-CVD RD; n=71) of CVD risk factors. Angiogenin and VEGF levels were quantified by ELISA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences for VEGF or angiogenin, between RD-CVD, non-CVD RD and HC groups (p=NS). Calculated risks for both CHD (p=0.017) and stroke (p=0.016) were higher when RD-CVD was compared to non-CVD RD and HC. Upon multivariate analysis, methotrexate use (p=0.006) and prior mycocardial infarction (MI) (p=0.034) were associated with higher angiogenin levels; body mass index (BMI) (p=0.034) and presence of RD (p=0.029) itself predicted lower levels. For RD patients, serum creatinine (p<0.001) and CRP levels, VEGF levels, and NSAID/COX2 inhibitor use (all p<0.05) were independently associated with CHD risk; plasma VEGF and serum creatinine levels were independently associated with stroke risk (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although levels of angiogenin were not significantly different between HC and RD patients, RD may have some influence on their variation. Methotrexate use and prior MI predicted higher angiogenin levels, whilst levels of VEGF were negatively associated with 10-year CHD and stroke risk.

Plasma indices of endothelial and platelet activation in Rheumatoid Disease: relationship to cardiovascular co-morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid Disease (RD) is associated with ischaemic heart disease (IHD). We sought to investigate whether abnormalities of endothelial function and platelet activation in patients with established RD were related to co-morbid cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, RD patients with no cardiac risk factors and normal cardiac function (RD, n=73), those with cardiovascular disease or risk factors and normal cardiac function (RD-risk, n=59), and those with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (RD-LVSD, n=21) were recruited, and compared to healthy controls (HC, n=76). Plasma levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF, an index of endothelial damage/dysfunction), soluble E-selectin (sE-sel, a marker of endothelial activation), and soluble P-selectin (sP-sel, an index of platelet activation) were studied. RESULTS: Plasma levels of vWF and sP-sel (but not sE-sel) were significantly higher among 153 RD patients compared to controls (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). Levels of vWF progressively rose with increasing cardiovascular risk across the four subgroups (p for trend<0.001). Previous IHD was independently associated with vWF levels, and diabetes mellitus (DM) was similarly associated with all three markers. RD itself and beta-blocker use were associated with sP-sel. CONCLUSION: Plasma levels of vWF and sP-sel are higher among RD patients. Levels of vWF were particularly influenced by cardiac risk factor status, and associated with known IHD and DM.

Effects of white European, African Caribbean and South Asian ethnicity on homocysteine levels in patients with systolic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure of any cause have elevated homocysteine compared to healthy controls. A number of studies in the UK and other western countries have documented higher levels of homocysteine among South Asian than among White European or African Caribbean subjects both in health and in disease, and have suggested that dietary deficiency of folate is the main cause for the difference. METHODS: Plasma homocysteine, vitamin B(12), and folate levels were measured in a multiethnic UK heart failure clinic population (n=112), and compared to matched control subjects (n=131). RESULTS: Plasma homocysteine levels were significantly higher in heart failure patients than controls (p<0.001), a result that was consistent across all ethnic groups. There was no difference in homocysteine levels by ethnic group in either patients (p=0.898) or controls (p=0.368). There was no significant difference in levels of folate or B(12) among patients or controls. Using a stepwise linear regression model, homocysteine levels in patients and controls were independently associated with age (p<0.001), vitamin B(12) (p<0.001), folate (p<0.001) and healthy control status (p<0.001), but not with gender, ethnicity, diabetes status, smoking status or BNP levels. CONCLUSION: This study does not provide evidence of ethnic differences in homocysteine levels between White European, South Asian, and African Caribbean subjects with systolic heart failure. The lack of difference in levels of folate or B(12) among patients or controls, suggests that homocysteine levels - and differences previously seen between South Asians and other ethnic groups - may be driven by dietary factors.

Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide for validation of a heart failure register in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction is difficult on clinical grounds alone. We sought to determine the accuracy of a heart failure register in a single primary care practice, and to examine the usefulness of b-type (or brain) natriuretic peptide (BNP) assay for this purpose. METHODS: A register validation audit in a single general practice in the UK was carried out. Of 217 patients on the heart failure register, 56 of 61 patients who had not been previously investigated underwent 12-lead electrocardiography and echocardiography within the practice site. Plasma was obtained for BNP assay from 45 subjects, and its performance in identifying echocardiographic abnormalities consistent with heart failure was assessed by analysing area under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: 30/217 were found to have no evidence to suggest heart failure on notes review and were probably incorrectly coded. 70/112 who were previously investigated were confirmed to have heart failure. Of those not previously investigated, 24/56 (42.9%) who attended for the study had echocardiographic left ventricular systolic dysfunction. A further 8 (14.3%) had normal systolic function, but had left ventricular hypertrophy or significant valve disease. Overall, echocardiographic features consistent with heart failure were found in only 102/203 (50.2%). BNP was poor at discriminating those with and without systolic dysfunction (area under ROC curve 0.612), and those with and without any significant echocardiographic abnormality (area under ROC curve 0.723). CONCLUSION: In this practice, half of the registered patients did not have significant cardiac dysfunction. On-site echocardiography identifies patients who can be removed from the heart failure register. The use of BNP assay to determine which patients require echocardiography is not supported by these data.

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction in rheumatoid disease: an unrecognized burden?

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to ascertain whether left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is more common among clinic patients with rheumatoid disease (RD) compared with the general population, and to assess the diagnostic utility of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). BACKGROUND: Patients with RD are at increased risk of ischemic heart disease. However, there are few large echocardiographic studies identifying cardiac dysfunction in RD. We hypothesized that LVSD would be more prevalent in RD patients than in the general population. METHODS: A total of 226 hospital out-patients with RD (65% women) underwent clinical evaluation, electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, and plasma BNP assay (218 patients). Prevalence of LVSD was compared with local population estimates. RESULTS: Definite LVSD (left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) occurred in 5.3% of the RD group: standardized prevalence ratio, 3.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.65 to 5.59. Median BNP values were higher in patients with LVSD compared with those without: 16.6 pmol/l versus 8.5 pmol/l, p < 0.005, although values between the two groups overlapped. One in nine patients with an abnormal ECG had definite LVSD. CONCLUSIONS: Definite LVSD was three times more common in RD patients than in the general population. Given the prognostic benefits of treating LVSD, echocardiographic screening of RD patients with an abnormal ECG may be worthwhile.

Rheumatoid disease and ischaemic heart disease: insights from pathophysiology and vascular biology.

Rheumatoid disease (RD) is a multisystem inflammatory disorder, which is associated with an increased cardiovascular mortality, thought to be due to ischaemic heart disease (IHD). The precise mechanisms causing increased IHD in RD are unclear. However, there is increasing recognition that atherosclerosis is another chronic inflammatory condition, which shares several pathophysiological features with RD. For example, endothelial damage/dysfunction, platelet activation, hypercoagulability and angiogenesis are well-recognised in both disease processes. Furthermore, RD may influence traditional risk factors such as dyslipidaemia. Although the exact reasons for the increased ischaemic burden are unclear, physicians should place a high priority upon reducing cardiovascular risk in sufferers of RD. This review summarises factors that might contribute to the pathogenesis of IHD in RD. Discussion will focus upon features shared by atherosclerotic and rheumatoid processes, as well as possible interactions between RD and conventional IHD risk factors.

Hibernating myocardium in heart failure.

Ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction may result from myocardial necrosis or from hypocontractile areas of viable myocardium. In some cases, recovery of contractility may occur on revascularization--this reversibly dysfunctional tissue is commonly referred to as hibernating myocardium. Observational data suggest that revascularization of patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction and known viable myocardium provides a survival benefit over medical therapy. Identification of viable, dysfunctional myocardium may be especially worthwhile in deciding which patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction will benefit from revascularization procedures. Randomized, prospective trials evaluating this are currently ongoing. This review will provide an overview of the complex pathophysiology of viable, dysfunctional myocardium, and will discuss outcomes after revascularization. Of the techniques used to determine the presence of hibernating myocardium, functional methods such as stress echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance appear more specific, but less sensitive, than the nuclear modalities, which assess perfusion and metabolic activity. Currently, the availability of all methods is variable.

Rheumatoid disease and the heart: from epidemiology to echocardiography.

Rheumatoid disease (RD) is a common chronic inflammatory condition associated with progressive joint destruction. Sufferers of RD experience reduced life expectancy, reflected in the increased standardised mortality rates reported in several studies over the last 50 years. Most studies indicate that the increased mortality affecting this population is mainly due to cardio-vascular disease. Epidemiological data have revealed an increased risk of developing ischaemic heart disease and heart failure in RD. The increased risk of ischaemic heart disease may result from traditional risk factors but data suggest that RD may confer risk independently. Although pericardial involvement, valvopathy and myocarditis are the most well-recognised cardiac manifestations of RD, and constitute a rheumatoid heart disease, these features are relatively benign. The current prevalence of rheumatoid heart disease in the era of early administration of disease-modifying therapy requires evaluation.

Drug development and the importance of ethnicity: lessons from heart failure management and implications for hypertension.

Heart failure is a common condition, associated with both poor prognosis and poor quality of life. In contrast to all other cardiovascular diseases, the prevalence of heart failure is increasing in the western world, and is likely to continue to do so as the population ages. In the UK, a significant proportion of patients with heart failure come from South Asian and African Caribbean ethnic groups. A large body of evidence exists that there may be epidemiological and pathophysiological differences between patients with heart failure from different ethnic groups. Treatments such as ACE inhibitors, which are now part of standard heart failure therapy, have an evidence base consisting of trials in patients of almost exclusively white ethnicity. Such treatments may not be equally effective in patients from other ethnic groups. This review will discuss the current evidence for heart failure management with respect to ethnicity, and consider the implications for future drug development and implications for antihypertensive therapy.